Facies and Sequence analysis of the Boltaña
antiform in the Spanish central Pyrenees
Fieldwork summer 1997
Photograph on the cover: View on the Boltaña
antiform from the hills in the South.
______________________________________________________________________
Herman Zevenberg & Johan Middelhoven
Institute of Earth Sciences, Free University Amsterdam
De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Contents
ABSTRACT
1 INTRODUCTION
-1.1 Purpose of fieldwork
-1.2 Fieldwork
methods and materials
-1.3 Regional geology
2 FACIES
AND SEQUENCE ANALYSIS
-2.1 Introduction
-2.2 Large Foraminifera
-2.3 Other
fossils and trace fossils
-2.4 Description
of a Parasequence
3 RESULTS
AND INTERPRETATION
-3.1 Interpretation
of the thin-sections
-3.2 Interpretation
of the stratigraphic sections
-3.3 Correlation
and discussion of the stratigraphic sections
-3.4 Results
and discussion of additional research
4 CONCLUSIONS
5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
6 REFERENCES
Appendixes
APPENDIX
I Map
APPENDIX II Section
1 West
APPENDIX III Section
2 East
APPENDIX IV Correlation
APPENDIX
V List of thin sections and soft samples
Note: Appendixes II, III, and IV are not available here. Please
ask me.
(C) Herman Zevenberg
ABSTRACT
The Boltaña Anticline was the subject of our fieldstudy
of six weeks in the summer of 1997. Detailed sections were made
of the west and east flanks of the antiform, which consist of platform
and slope sediments of middle Eocene age. Also many samples were
taken to study the contents in thin sections for later analysis.
The purpose was to correlate the two sections with sequence stratigraphy
analysis, and to find out more about the origin of the Boltaña
antiform and the regional geological setting. The trends and sequences
give evidence of changes in relative sea level and carbonate production
(accommodation space) in the investigated area. Faulting is probably
also an important factor. In the two lithological different sections
many sequences could be recognized and the two sections could be
correlated. With this investigation of the detailed sections, the
Boltaña region could be placed better in a regional geological
perspective. Also several hypothesis are presented for the origin
of the Boltaña antiform and for the origin of the turbiditic
sediments in the west section, although further research is needed.
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose of fieldwork
As part of the HD630 course ‘Fieldwork Sedimentology/Stratigraphy’
at the faculty of Earth Sciences at the Free University Amsterdam,
fieldwork was carried out in the Boltaña antiform region
in the central Spanish Pyrenees (Fig. 1.). The antiform consists
of middle Eocene marine platform and slope facies with different
environmental developments in the east and west sections and was
studied along the road Ainsa-Torla (N 260) between Boltaña
and Janovas. The east section was also partly studied on the road
to Sabiñanigo (A 1604). On each of the flanks detailed sections
were made and samples taken. From the hart of the antiform sections
were taken until the point that no further sequences could be recognized,
and only deeper water sediments were deposited. This resulted in
two logs of nearly one km stratigraphy each. The east section is
divided in several parts because of several structural complications.
The purpose of this fieldwork was to correlate the two different
flanks with the help of sequence stratigraphy. Another purpose of
the fieldstudy was to place the antiform in a regional geological
setting and to find out the origin of the antiform itself together
with M. de Cock who did the structural part of the fieldwork, and
of the turbiditic sediments in the east section. By doing this,
the research could be spread to nearby areas. More west of the antiform
itself, some extra fieldwork was carried out to find out the origin
of the Boltaña antiform and the turbidite deposits. Maurice
de Cock, who was also working in the same area at the same time,
was investigating the structural development of the Boltaña
antiform.
1.2 Fieldwork
methods and materials
The Spanish topographic maps of Boltaña (30-10 (211)) and
Broto (30-9 (178)) by Cartografía Militar de España
were used for orientation in the field (scale 1:50.000).
We used photocopies in the field to note the locations of the different
parts of the sections. Aerial photographs (211A 10-12, 211B 12-14,
211C 11-13) were used to determine the locations of the best sections
with the least number of important faults, and to try to determine
the distribution of the turbidite deposits west of the anticline
itself. The sections were mostly described along roads and rivers
because the sections were easy accessible and there were few gaps.
Only in the most eastern part of the east section we had to find
parts of the stratigraphic column off-road. Also major slumping
and faulting disturbed the east section.
In the field two detailed sections were made of the Boltaña
antiform using millimeter logpaper. Every bed in the field was measured
and drawn on the log (scale 1:100) together with the natural appearance
in the field, the lithology and sedimentary structures. On the log
there was also space to describe the grainsize of the quartz, notation
for sedimentary structures, bioturbation, fossil contents, thickness
trends, grainsize trends, color and peculiarities. For every few
meters or at least in every bed, the percentages of the different
large Foraminifera was estimated. For determination of the fossil content,
the large Foraminifera and the grainsize a 10x handlens was used.
From the logs, condensed stratigraphic columns were produced (scale
1:1.000).
From the hills opposite of the Boltaña antiform many photographs
were taken, which were later glued together, making it possible
to sketch each sequence on the photographs. These sequences were
numbered and also drawn in the condensed stratigraphic columns.
From several perspectives several drawings of parts of the antiform
were made which served as an aid with the photographs to draw and
number the sequences. With this we could already determine the correlation
at the bottom of the two sections. A complicating factor is that
because of the sections are not perpendicular to the lithology,
the bottom of the two sections are much closer to each other at
the time of deposition than the top of the section.
From every bed samples were taken for later analysis. From the
thicker beds mostly three samples were taken; one at the bottom,
one in the middle and one at the top. This resulted at the end of
the fieldwork in about 400 samples. At first instance 59 thin sections
were made to make a first correlation between the sections together
with the drawn sequences from the photographs. Later 26 additional
thin sections were made to make the correlation. Also 6 soft samples
were investigated.
The thin sections were studied with a stereomicroscope with magnifications
ranging from 10x to 60x. The thin sections first were classified
in type of limestone (limemudstone, wackestone, grainstone, floatstone,
rudstone and packstone). Then the numbers and species of the larger
Foraminifera (Assilina, Nummulites, Discocyclina,
Alveolina, Miliolids, Rotalia) were identified. When
the grainsize/roundness/sorting differed from the mean it was noted
and also the presence of quartz with estimated percentages, other
fossils, heavy minerals and carbonate clasts. All this information
was put on ‘Administration Cards’ and later the most important information
such as the Foraminifera and quartz percentages were added to the
condensed stratigraphic columns of the sections. Biozones were later
determined for each thin section. This information was used together
with the field information to make the final correlation between
the sections.
1.3 Regional geology
The Pyrenees is a mountain chain extending for about 1500 km from
Northwest Spain to Southern France. The mountains are formed as
part of the Alpine orogeny as a result of relative movement of the
European and the Iberian plate. Deformation took place from the
upper Cretaceous until in the Miocene because of the subduction
of the undercrust and subcrustal lithosphere of the Iberian plate
under the European plate. During the early phase of the orogenesis
a forelanddeep was formed. The deformation fronts migrated towards
the forelandbasins. Because of that the forelandbasins migrated
as well.
The central Pyrenees is subdivided in three structural units divided
by major thrusts. From north to south: ‘North Pyrenean Thrust System’,
‘Axial zone’ and ‘South Pyrenean Thrust System. Our research area
is located in the South Pyrenean Thrust zone. This zone consists
of south dipping Mesozoic thrust sheets. In this perspective the
north-south Boltaña antiform is a strange phenomenon (see
chapter 4.2 for discussion). The Boltaña region is on the
border of the Jaca basin and the Tremp-Graus basin (see fig 1.).
In the South Pyrenean Thrust zone during the early Mesozoic nonmarine
clastic sediments, volcanic material, shallow marine carbonates
and evaporites were deposited. The evaporites from the Triassic
were to play an important role in the forming of certain structures
in the Pyrenees. Then about 2500m marine shallow water carbonates
were deposited before the beginning of the orogenesis. A major transgression
took place in the Eocene inundating the forelandbasins. An average
of 4000m of flysch was deposited in the forelandbasins that moved
south with the thrust belt. At the margins of the forelandbasins
about 1500m carbonate platform deposits were formed. These are also
found in the Boltaña region.
Fig.1 Geologic sketch map showing the setting of the Jaca and Tremp-Graus
basins and the Boltaña antiform in the south central Pyrenees
(modified after Barnolas & Teixell, 1994). Top is North.
2 FACIES AND
SEQUENCE ANALYSIS
2.1 Introduction
Sequences can be described as depositional system tracts. These
are combinations of lithofacies, which are deposited during the
same period and under more or less the same circumstances. The term
‘system tracts’ is based on relative sea level change, the accompanying
deposits and accommodation space.
Three types of system tracts are recognised (van Wagoner et al.,
1988);
-Transgressive system tract (TST):
The sequence begins with rapid relative sea level rise and aggradation
of the carbonate platform. This characterizes a transgressive system
tract.
The termination of a TST is the Maximum Flooding Surface (MFS)
which is generally followed by a HST.
-Highstand system tract (HST)
The relative sea level remains the same; the only way the platform
can grow is by progradation of the platform in lateral directions.
-Lowstand system tract (LST
This system tract occurs when rapid sea level drop occurs and exposes
the shelf edge. Erosion takes place at the platform. The LST is
not always present or is unrecognizable; then the HST is followed
directly by a TST separated by a sequence boundary (SB).
A combination of tectonics (creating accommodation space) and eustatic
sea level fluctuations can result in a cyclic alternation of secondary
TST’s and HST’s, also called ‘parasequences’.
A description of a parasequence is made in paragraph 2.4
Fig.2 Example of a sequence eroded in the field in the west section.
2.2 Large Foraminifera
Large benthonic Foraminifera were used together with other information
obtained in the field to reconstruct the paleo-environment and to
correlate the two sections. In the setting of a carbonate platform,
every specific depositional environment has its own assemblage of
larger Foraminifera dependent on the place on the platform or slope.
Due to changes in relative sealevel, carbonate production and accommodation
space those biofacies tend to shift. With the percentages data of
certain Foraminifera and other data in the section, sequences could
be recognised. The trends and the Foraminifera data were most valuable.
In a supposed mainly ‘open shoal’ carbonate platform setting, the
Foraminifer Alveolina sp. is mainly present at the open intertidal
part of the platform. Nummulites sp., Assilina sp.
and Discocyclina sp. are mainly present in the open shoal
until the offshore part of the carbonate platform. These Foraminifera
are Tertiary and are present in the entire studied section which
is from middle Eocene age.
In general the Imperforate foraminifera (i.e. Alveolina
and Miliolids) indicate a near shore environment while the
Perforate foraminifera (i.e. Assilina and Nummulites)
live in a deeper environment. If these two groups occur both at
the same time in the section then there was no barrier. When a barrier
was present, both groups are not present together in the rocks,
because the groups were separated.
- Miliolidae: Because of the difficulties identifying the different
species in this family, they are not further described. In the described
section they have a low abundance. The Miliolinids are relatively
small and difficult to recognize in the field. See Fig. 3 and 4.
Fig.3 Example of the family Miliolidae Pyrgo sp. ; magn:
80X
Fig.4 Example of the family Miliolidae Quinqueloculina
sp. ; magn: 80X

Fig.5 Example of family Alveolinidae
Fig.6 Example of family Alveolinidae
Glomalveolina sp. ; magn: 50X
Alveolina cf. coudurensis ; magn: 20X
Axial section Axial section
- Alveolinidae: Like the Miliolinids this family is not easily
identified to the species level. This family is relatively very
abundant in the sections. Alveolinidae are abundant in lagoons and
intertidal parts of a carbonate platform, in a reef – lagoon setting
or in the open shoal part of carbonate platforms in an ‘open shoal’
setting. Alveolinids are usually long and elongated and are usually
white. See Fig. 5 and 6.
- Discocyclina sp.: This Foraminifer is small and lens shaped
and has a thin equatorial layer. Usually it has a relatively dark
color and is easy recognizable also in the field. See Fig. 7. It
is relatively abundant in parts of the sections. It is abundant
in the open shoal and beginning of the slope in an ‘open shoal’
setting of carbonate platforms. In a setting with reefs, Discocyclina
is not very common but can also be present in the open shoal and
beginning of the slope.
Fig. 7 Discocyclina dispansa ; magn: 20X ; vertical section
- Assilina sp.: Together with Nummulites sp. it has
different shapes mainly dependent on the waterdepth. The big flat
specimens lived near shore, and the more lens shaped specimens lived
in deeper water. The only difference with Nummulites sp.
is its internal evolute chamber structure. See Fig. 8. Assilina
sp. is very abundant in many parts of the studied sections.
In vertical sections of the relatively big Assilina sp. is
very easy to recognize, also in the field.
Fig. 8 Assilina sp. ; magn: 25X ; horizontal section and
vertical section
- Nummulites sp.: Together with Assilina sp. it has
different shapes mainly dependent on the waterdepth. The big flat
specimens lived near shore, and the more lens shaped specimens lived
in deeper water. The only difference with Assilina sp. is
its internal involute chamber structure. See Fig. 8. In the field
in the vertical sections Nummulites sp. are very easy to
identify.
Fig. 9 Nummulites sp. ; magn: 12,5X and 20X ; horizontal
section and vertical section
- Rotalia sp.: This small foraminifer occurs in two forms
(Geel, pers. Comm). One form
lives relatively deep on the shelf and has a brown shell. The second
form has a relatively thick shell and lives in very shallow water
near the end of the reef zone. See fig. 10.
Fig. 10. Rotalia sp. ; magn: 40X ; horizontal section.
- Orbitolites sp.: This foraminifer is found mainly behind
coastal barriers, normally associated with Assilina and Miliolids.
See fig. 11.
Fig 11. Orbitilites sp. ; magn:20X ; vertical section.
- Some other Foraminifera were also found, but in very small numbers.
These are:
Operculina sp. (See Fig. 12), Nodosaria sp., Actinocyclina
sp. and Amphistegina sp.
Fig. 12. Operculina sp. ; magn: 12,5X ; horizontal section.
2.3
Other fossils and trace fossils
- Micraster sp. (see Fig. 13). An echinoderm that is heart
shaped. This fossil occurs mostly in the carbonate layers with ball-shaped
structures. These are most common in the east section of the antiform,
but occur as well in the west section. The echinoderm is 3 to 6
centimeters wide. We found about 40 specimens.
Fig. 13. Example of a micraster. This is a Micraster
cortestudinarium from the Cretaceous.
- The Arthropod Xanthopsis dufouri (see Fig. 14). This crab
occurs is the same carbonates as the Micraster sp. About
20 crabs were found; many of them at the same place on a hill south
of the sections on the other side of the river. Distinction can
be made between the male and the female crabs because of difference
in size of the pincers. The males have one very big pincer and one
small pincer. The females have two small pincers and are generally
smaller. The crabs are well preserved, so they are probably found
in situ. The crabs are between 5 and 10 centimeters wide.
Fig. 14. The crab Xanthopsis dufouri found in Boltaña. Female
and Male specimens.
- Echinoderm which is not further identified. This irregular sea
urchin is very big, about 15 centimeters. We found one perfect specimen
and parts of three more specimens. These echinoderms like the micraster
sp. and the crabs were only found in the carbonates with ball-shaped
structures.
- Several bivalves of several different species were found in the
described sections. These are not further identified because of
most of them only the inside cast was preserved. The only bivalve
identified is Chlamys sp. (see Fig. 15). The bivalve is 3
centimeters wide.
Fig. 15. Chlamys
sp.
- In the sections we also found four small black teeth fragments.
Possible they are fish teeth. The smallest is about one millimeter
wide and the biggest is about 4 millimeters wide.
- In the top of the west section in the last sequence near the
village of Janovas, we found several strange tubes build with foraminifer
skeletons. The tubes are about four centimeters wide. The inside
diameter is about 2 centimeters. The tubes were probably build by
some kind of worm-like organism that used the tube as protection.
The foraminifers are a little obliquely cemented together to form
the tube.
- Very big and round Nummulites sp were found in Liguere
de Ara, which is located about 5 kilometers west of Janovas which
is the west end of our sections. The Nummulites sp. was found
in an extensive area with marls. These marls lie probably stratigraphically
on top of our west section. The foraminifer has a diameter of two
till two and a half centimeter and is about one centimeter thick.
- Also outside our section area, we found many corals and other
associated reef organisms on a hill directly north east of the village
Boltaña. We found them in relatively soft material. The area
consists of marls with occasionally turbidites and lies stratigraphically
on top of a thick turbidite layers of our east section. We think
the reef material is part of such a turbidite layer and that it
comes from far away. The Ostrea sp. we found shows evidence
of transport, the delicate corals show little evidence of transport,
but were possibly moved in large blocks. The area has a very dense
shrub cover, so we could not determine if the material is really
part of a turbidite. The material consists of at least ten different
species of coral, several oysters Ostrea sp., possibly some
sponges, several crinoids, three echinoderm spines and a gastropod.
Also many big flat foraminifers (Nummulites sp. and Assilina
sp.) till four centimeters wide and several millimeters thick
were found.
- Dacycladacea were found in the thin sections. These green
algae live in low energy environments. They are most abundant in
warm shallow waters behind reefs (Genot, 1991).
- Serpula sp.: Worm tubes, they are present in the thin
sections. They live on a hard substrate.
- Ditrupa sp.: Another type of worm tube that lives on soft
or no substrate.
- Lithothamnium: This encrusting coraline algae is present
in our thin sections and was probably most abundant in shallow waters
(<30m).
- Planktonic foraminifera are also present in some of the thin
sections. The exact species of the planktonic foraminifera were
not determined.
2.4 Description
of a Parasequence
On the west side on the Boltaña antiform many sequences
are very good visible in the field. Many Parasequences are also
present. We studied one of the parasequences (Fig. 16) also in the
thin-sections. The thin-sections we studied are 275a, 275b 277 and
278b.
275a Biozone V (See paragraph 3.1 for a description of the biozones)
275b Biozone III
277 Biozone IV
278b Biozone V
The base of the parasequence consists of thin-bedded marls. Upwards
more and more carbonate layers are present (gradual thickening upwards
trend). This trend leads to thick to massive ‘layers’ of carbonate
without marl. This thickening upward trend is the HST part of the
parasequence. Then the trend switches to a thinning upwards trend;
the TST. More and thicker marl layers are present upwards until
there are no carbonate layers left. The grain size of the quartz
is coarsening upwards in the HST part and fining upwards in the
TST part of the parasequence.
All the paleobiological information (Fig. 16) derived from the
thin-sections perfectly fits with this HST/TST model. The Miliolids,
Nummulites sp., Assilina sp. and Discocyclina sp.
increase to the transition between HST and TST then decrease
again. The planktonic foraminifera decrease and increase in exactly
the opposite way.
Fig 16. Details of the parasequence. From left to right: the erosion
profile, lithology, grainsize, quartz percentage, Miliolids, Alveolina
sp., Nummulites sp., Assilina sp., Discocyclina sp.,
planktonic foraminifera and the biozone.
3 RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION
3.1 Interpretation
of the thin-sections
To determine the different environments represented in our thin
sections, the foraminifera were plotted in the sections (see Appendix
II and III). Each difference in the abundance of the foraminifera
is the result of differences in the environment. On this basis we
could determine six biofacies which are described below and each
represent a different depositional environment. This was done using
the different abundance of the different foraminifera, the large-scale
regressive and transgressive trends and the information about the
foraminifera present in the literature.
The foraminifera abundance of the used species are plotted. (See
Fig. 17)
Also very important is the abundance of Perforate and Imperforate
foraminifera. This can be used to determine whether there was
a barrier present at that time or not (see chapter 2.2).
Sometimes subfacies are recognised to express this difference.
Fig. 17. Paleoecological distribution of some foraminifera present
in the central Pyrenees (modified after Luterbacher, 1984).
Biofacies Ia:
Beach
The environment is extreme sandy (Qtz content > 40% in most cases).
The quartz-grainsize is medium to very coarse. No fauna is present,
only a few miliolids and shellfragments.
Thin sections no.: HJ36a, HJ 55b, HJ 261a, HJ 273a, HJ 290a,
and HJ 292.
Biofacies Ib:
Lagoon.
Shallow, restricted environment with the first foraminifera present:
Miliolids. The environment is very sandy (Qtz content > 20%).
The quartz-grainsize is ranging from medium to coarse. Together
with the miliolids sometimes bryozoa and dacycladacea are present.
In some thin sections Nummulites sp. are also present, but
these are not ‘in situ'
Thin sections no.: HJ37a, HJ 41, HJ 48, HJ 251a, HJ 251c,
and HJ 292.
Biofacies IIa:
Bay; restricted reef environment with sand.
The environment is very sandy (Qtz content > 25%). The quartz grainsize
is medium to very coarse. For the first time more then one species
of foraminifera is present: Together with miliolids, Alveolina
sp. is often present in the thin sections. Sometimes also Rotalia
sp. and Nummulites sp. can be found. Other organisms
are Bryozoa, Dacycladacea, Micraster sp. and gastropods as
well as shell fragments.
Thin sections no.: HJ6b, HJ 20b, HJ 215a, HJ 217, HJ 225,
HJ 232, HJ 239b, HJ 240b, HJ 244b, HJ 246a, HJ 247b, HJ 247c, HJ
248a, HJ 250b, HJ 252c, and HJ 296.
Biofacies IIb:
Restricted reef environment without sand.
This is the same environment as biozone 2a. The only difference
is the Quartz content, which is less then 25%. In biozone 2a there
is probably more supply of sand. The location of
biozone 2a/2b is however the same in our environmental models.
(Many) Miliolids and/or Alveolina sp. are present in the
thin sections. Sometimes Rotalia sp. and Nummulites sp.
Thin sections no.: HJ228b, HJ 229b, HJ 252a, and HJ 265.
Biofacies III:
Carbonate shoal; healthy open shelf environment.
The quartz content is commonly < 25%, with Quartz grainsizes
ranging from medium to coarse. The first Perforate foraminifera
are present like Assilina sp. and Discocyclina sp
together with Nummulites sp. Imperforate species like Alveolina
sp. an Miliolids are still present. There are still no planktonic
foraminifera. Other organisms found in the thin sections and in
the field are a single Orbitolites sp., bryozoa and shell
fragments.
Thin sections no.: HJ11a, HJ 57a, HJ 234a, HJ 235, HJ 254a,
HJ 275b and HJ 253b.
Biofacies IV:
Upper slope.
The quartz content is commonly < 25%, with quartz grainsizes
ranging from fine to medium. Sometimes more sand is present due
to (proximal) turbidites. Perforate foraminifera such as Discocyclina
sp. and Assilina sp. can be found. No Alveolina sp.
and Miliolids are present anymore in this deeper environment. Other
organisms and foraminifera in this environment are bryozoa, Ditrupa
sp., serpulids, Micraster sp., a single Actinocyclina
sp. and Operculina sp. as well as shell fragments.
Thin sections no.: HJ1, HJ 23b, HJ 25a, HJ 27b, HJ 61, HJ
67, HJ 69, HJ 197, HJ 214b, and HJ 259a.
Biofacies V:
Deeper slope.
The quartz content is commonly < 10%, with quartz grainsizes
ranging from very fine to fine. The first planktonic foraminifera
are present together with Discocyclina sp. Assilina sp.
is not present anymore. Other organisms and foraminifera are Operculina
sp., bryozoa, micraster sp. and shell fragments.
Thin sections no.: HJ69, HJ 188, HJ 202b, HJ 208, HJ 275a,
HJ 278b, and HJ 285a.
Biofacies VI:
Proximal/Distal; deep open marine environment
The quartz content is commonly < 10%, with quartz grainsizes
are max. very fine. Sometimes more sand is present due to (distal)
turbidites. In this environment, only planktonic foraminifera are
present. Other organisms found are Micraster sp. and a single
crab.
Thin sections no.: HJ93b, HJ 92, (HJ 90b), HJ 86a, HJ 81,
HJ 52, HJ 35a, HJ 103, HJ 155, HJ 174, HJ 179b, HJ 186, HJ 164,
HJ 165, HJ 167b, HJ 200, HJ 277, HJ 283, and HJ 285c.
3.2
Interpretation of the stratigraphic sections
Section I west
'Section I (west)' is like 'section II (east) of Middle Eocene
age. Section I has a total length of approximately 1100 meters.
The base consists of middle to thick-bedded carbonates, interbedded
with a marl layer. These sediments are deposited in a deeper marine
environment, which is proved by abundant planktonic foraminifera.
Some burrows are present. There is a 'shallowing upwards trend'
visible; this trend is gradual although some parasequences (TST)
are present. The shallowing up trend is proved by the existence
of a platformslope facies: bally carbonates, preceded by deeper
marine sediments. At 200 Meters above the base, the first miliolids
'in situ' occur and also Discocyclina sp., Nummulites
sp. and Assilina sp. This gives evidence for a shallower
environment; Looking at the biozones, there is a shift in the first
360 meters from biozone 6 to biozone 2 (=protected environment,
containing Alveolina sp. and or miliolids). In the
next 200 meters, there are only small changes in environment:
Biozone 1A en 2 occurs. Only in two cases the environment is not
(so much) protected.
Slide 234a and 235 contain besides Alveolina sp. and/or
miliolids also Nummulites sp.,
Discocyclina sp. and/or Assilina sp.; This is biozone
3, a shallow, open shelf environment.
In the context however, this biozone is nearer to the shore then
biozone 3 normally is. There is no reef present and biozone model
2 is used to explain the HST.
In these 200 meters of section, the lithology consists of mostly
middle bedded sandy carbonates; sometimes burrows and Micraster
sp. are present together with some pyrite and shellfragments. At
580 Meters above the base, a change occurs. The environment first
deepens en then shallows again. (Shift Biozone 2 to biozone 6, then
back to biozone 1).
This trend occurs in ca 200 meters of the section. The lithology
is middle to thick-bedded sandy carbonates with sometimes shellfragments,
some Micraster sp. and pyrite (see also Appendix II section 1 west).
At ca. 200 meters beneath the top of this section the environment
dramatically deepens (biozone 1A to biozone 6), after which a gradual
shallowing upwards trend (via parasequences, see also paragraph
2.4) from biozone 6 to biozone 3 occurs. After this shallowing upwards
trend, the environment finally deepens (the platform is drowned,
biozone 6 with abundant plankton occurs). The lithology consists
of interbedded very thin-bedded marls and thick-bedded carbonates
with gradual changes via thickening/thinning upward and coarsening/fining
upward in the parasequences. In the thick-bedded carbonates, burrows
and shellfragments are present, sometimes Micraster sp. The
top of the section consists of very thin-bedded marls underlining
the final drowning of the platform.
Section II East
The section has a total length of ca. 700 meters and is of middle
Eocene age. The base is formed in a shallow, protected environment
(biozone 2). In the basal 130 meters is a gradual deepening trend
present until biozone 6. The lithology consists of middle to thick
bedded carbonates interbedded with thin bedded marls (see also Appendix
III section II East). The bedding type is mainly small-scale crossbedding.
A few burrows, Micraster sp. and shellfragments are present.
After this first trend the platform dramatically progrades (biozone
6 to biozone 1A)
Then there are 100 meters of section with a relatively static environment
with biozone 1A and 2 are present. The lithology is mainly middle
to thick bedded, sandy carbonate to sandstone with small-scale crossbedding.
A few Micraster sp., burrows and shellfragments are present.
At 220 meters from the base a new change occurs, the gradual deepening
and final drowning of the platform. (Change from biozone 1A to biozone
6 with abundant planktonic foraminifera). This deepening trend is
extra underlined by the presence of glauconite and a
'platformslope facies' or 'bally carbonates'. The carbonates on
the platform slope are stretched by 'slope gravity' and become bally.
The lithology consists of middle to thick-bedded carbonates, with
some thin bedded marl layers. The top of the concordant section
consists of thin-bedded marls. (Final drowning also underlined by
these marls).
Discordantly deposited on the marls are massflows and mainly turbidites,
consisting of coarse middle to thick-bedded sandstones and conglomerates/breccia.
Barnolas & Teixell interpret these massflows/turbidites as a
submarine canyonfill.
3.3
Correlation and discussion of the stratigraphic sections
Dividing the east section in three megatrends and the west section
in 5 megatrends can correlate the two sections.
Megatrend 1: A very gradual shallowing trend in the west
section and an overall shallowing trend in the east section.
Megatrend 2: A TST and followed by a HST can be recognised
in both sections however the strength of these trends is different.
These trends represent an overall shallowing upward trend in the
west section and a rapid deepening in the east section.
Megatrend 3 starts on both sections with a TST. However,
in the east section this TST is the final trend in the section resulting
in the drowning of the platform. In the west section, megatrend
3 continues (containing several HST’s and TST's) and is a period
of stable shallow platform-conditions (biozone 1a/2).
Megatrend 4 is only visible in the west section and contains
a deepening and afterwards a shallowing upward trend.
Megatrend 5 is the final trend visible in the west section,
starting with several parasequences and resulting in the final drowning
of the west section (a deepening/drowning trend).
The west and East sections first were correlated using field photographs
and drawings. In a later stadium, the HST-TST trends from the thin-sections
and the bedding trends have been used to make a final correlation
(See Appendix IV).
The first three units (1a, 1b, and 1c) are data from correlations
made in the field (See Appendix IV). Looking at the HST’s and TST's
in the first three units a big HST in the West section correlates
with smaller HST’s and TST’s in the east section. The big HST at
the base of the west section however is not certain, and only based
on the absolute decreasing amount of planktonic foraminifera.
At the base both sections have an overall shallowing upward trend
and together with the field data, they can be relative easy correlated.
The correlation of megatrend 2 can be explained by a platform, moving
to the west: In this case the west section shallows, while the east
section deepens. Megatrend 3 is a continuation of this process.
Stable shallow platform conditions in the west section, while the
east section continues deepening and finally drowns.
After having two more megatrends, the west section also drowns.
Megatrends 4 and 5 cannot be correlated because in the east section
part of the section has been eroded and filled with turbidites.
In general whole the section can be explained by a platform shifting
to the west. But this west shift is alternating with small margin
shifts to the east (progradational shifts) Evidence for this are
the disappearing beds both to the east and to the west in the antiform
(see fig. 18).
Fig. 18. Lateral disappearing beds in the antiform. Magnification
just west of the top of the antiform, looking to the north.
In subsection I of the east section we found evidence of a progressive
unconformity (Bertotti, pers. comm. 1997). This can be used as evidence
for a fast deepening of the environment due to tectonics. The progressive
unconformity occurred in the marls just below the discordance with
the turbidites on the road to Sabiñanigo.
3.4
Results and discussion of additional research
In the field we found as part of our east section
a big deposit of turbidites. We could determine the direction of
flow at several locations in the section by using flute casts and
other sedimentary structures associated with turbiditic deposits.
The sediments have the same nature as the turbidites on the other
side of the Boltaña antiform (Barnolas, A. & A.
Teixell, 1994). We measured the direction of the paleocurrents in
the turbidite section in the east.
Results of the measurements in the east section near Boltaña
(in degrees):
130
110
124
135
130
130
140
104 average: 123
The average direction of the paleocurrents is south-east.
The direction of the paleocurrents in the turbidites west of the
antiform is west-northwest or east-southeast. The exact direction
of the flow was not clear because of bad preserved flutecasts.
To investigate the possibility that the turbidites on both sides
of the Boltaña antiform have the same origin, more measurements
at the other side of the anticline are needed. Barnolas, A. &
A. Teixell investigated the west turbidite section and they say
the carbonate platform collapsed and there was an incision of a
submarine canyon of at least 800 meters deep.
We found more to the south in subsection I in the east section
much more stratigraphy before the turbidite section started. This
can be evidence the east turbidites section is also formed in a
canyon. Just below the discordance, progressive unconformity occurred
(see paragraph 3.3) and this can be evidence of a tectonic event
that also could have caused the massive turbidite deposits.
We think it is possible that the nortwest-southeast canyon formed
before the anticline formed. When the anticline formed afterwards,
the middle part of the turbidite canyon was eroded and the sections
of turbidites on both sides of the anticline were left. Maurice
de cock concludes in his paper that the antiform developed due to
salt doming and thrusting at the same time. He describes the massive
turbidite deposits as a result of the doming.
If the two turbidite sections are not of the same origin (two stream-directions
in the turbidites in stead of one stream-direction), the eastern
turbidites can be a normal turbidite section and not a single canyonfill
conform the conclusions of M. de Cock.
The Boltaña antiform itself is a north-south structure in
an east-west mountainrange. This is strange because all other geological
structures in the Pyrenees are east-west structures because of the
north-south compression during the forming of the Pyrenees. Maurice
de cock concludes in his paper that the antiform developed due to
salt doming and thrusting at the same time.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In both sections (East and West flanks of the Boltaña anticline)
the same overall trend is present: At the base of both sections
deeper marine sediments, then a shallowing upward trend to a reef/restricted
environment. After that the environment deepens again until the
platform finally drowns. The West section starts deepening much
earlier then the East section probably due to faulting.
The correlation of the two sections has many difficulties. The
east section is much more compact than the west section. When the
environment is deeper marine at the west section, the east section
is shallow marine thus resulting in very different sediments and
differences in thickness. (See Appendices II and III)
The two sections can still be correlated using field-photographs
and using sequences (see paragraph 1.2 Fieldwork methods and materials).
The final correlation of the different sections is shown in Appendix
IV.
To make a clear overview we give a summary of the events:
- First the base of the sections were deposited with deepwater
platform deposits in the west and shallow platform deposits in
the east.
- Then the platform shifted to the west probably due to tectonic
causes. Deep water deposits in the east and shallow water platform
deposits in the west. Occasionally the platform margin shifted
more to the east probably due to small relative sea level changes.
- Then the platform drowned. Marl deposits indicating deep water
in the west; the east section is not complete due to erosion by
the turbidites.
- To make a final conclusion on the origin of the east and west
turbidite deposits more research is needed to investigate whether
the two turbidite sections are deposited in one ‘canyon’ or deposited
on both sides of the antiform independent from each other. This
is necessary to determine if these deposits formed before or as
a consequence of the forming of the antiform.
- The antiform formed probably due to a combination of salt doming
and thrusting (M. de Cock, 1998).
- This part of the Boltaña region was uplifted as a consequence
of the forming of the Pyrenees.
- Erosion of the mountain-chain exposed the sections of the Boltaña
antiform.
5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
First we want to thank the Free University in Amsterdam for giving
us the opportunity to do sedimentological research in the Pyrenees.
We want to thank Dr. T. Geel for supervising our fieldwork study
and for teaching us the fieldwork methods and also for helping us
with the correlation of the sections. Also we want to thank Dr.
A. Fortuin, Dr. C. Bierman and Dr. G. Bertotti for helping us in
the field. Last but not least we want to thank the rock-laboratory
at the Free University in Amsterdam for making the thin sections.
We also want to thank Dr. R. Fraaije for identifying the fossil
crabs and E. v.d. Braak for providing the photograph on the cover.
6 REFERENCES
Barnolas, A. & A. Teixell, 1994. Platform sedimentation
and collapse in a carbonate-dominated margin of a forelandbasin
(Jaca basin, Eocene, southern Pyrenees).Geology, v. 22,p. 1107-1110.
Cock, M de, 1998. Verslag Boltaña anticline. Free
University Amsterdam.
Gaemers, P.A.M., 1978. Biostratigraphy, palaeoecology and
palaeogeography of the mainly marine Ager formation (Upper Paleocene-Lower
Eocene) in the Tremp basin, Central South Pyrenees, Spain. Leidse
Geologische Mededelingen., 51: 151-231.
Geel, T., 1990. Microfacies van carbonaatgesteenten. Free
University Amsterdam.
Genot, P., 1991. Cenozoic and recent Dacycladales, in: Riding,
R. (ed.) Calcareous Algae and Stromatolites, 131-145.
Lunsen, H. A. van. Geology of the Ara-Cinca region, Spanish
Pyrenees, Province of Huesca. Publications of the "Geologisch
Instituut" of the Utrecht State University.
Wagoner, J.C. van, Posamentier, H.W., Mitchum, R.M., Vail,
P.R., Sarg, J.F.,Loutit,T.S. & J. Hardenbol, 1988. An overview
of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definition.
In: Sea-level changes: An integrated approach (ed. by C.K. Wilgus,
B.S. Hastings,C.G. St C. Kendall, H.W. Posamrentier, C.A. Ross
& J.C. Van Wagoner). Special publication, Society of economic
Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Tulsa, 42, 39-45.
APPENDIX
V List of thin sections and soft samples
Thin Sections:
Sample number Thin section no. Sample number Thin section no.
HJ 1
46926
HJ 214b
46956
HJ 6b
46927
HJ 215a
46957
HJ 11a
46928
HJ 217
48185
HJ 20b
46929
HJ 225
48186
HJ 23b
46930
HJ 228b
46958
HJ 25a
48175
HJ 229b
48187
HJ 27b
48176
HJ 232
46959
HJ 33
46931
HJ 234a
48188
HJ 35a
48177
HJ 235
48189
HJ 36a
48178
HJ 239b
46960
HJ 37a
48179
HJ 240b
46961
HJ 41
46932
HJ 244b
48190
HJ 48
46933
HJ 247b
46962
HJ 52
46934
HJ 248a
46963
HJ 55b
48180
HJ 251c
46964
HJ 57a
46935
HJ 252a
46965
HJ 61
46936
HJ 252c
48191
HJ 67
46937
HJ 253b
46966
HJ 69
46938
HJ 254a
46967
HJ 77
46939
HJ 259a
46968
HJ 81
46940
HJ 261a
46969
HJ 86a
46941
HJ 265
46970
HJ 90b
46942
HJ 268a
46971
HJ 92
48181
HJ 273a
46972
HJ 93b
46943
HJ 275a
48192
HJ 96
48182
HJ 275b
46973
HJ 103
48183
HJ 277
48193
HJ 107
46944
HJ 278b
48194
HJ 155
46945
HJ 283a
46974
HJ 164
46946
HJ 285a
46975
HJ 165
46947
HJ 285c
46976
HJ 167b
46948
HJ 290a
46977
HJ 174
46949
HJ 292
46978
HJ 179b
48184
HJ 296
46979
HJ 186
46950
HJ 301b
46980
HJ 188
46951
HJ 309
46981
HJ 197
46952
HJ 320
46982
HJ 200
46953
HJ 326b
46983
HJ 202b
46954
HJ 333a
46984
HJ 208
46955
Soft Samples:
HJ 10
HJ 46
HJ 106a
HJ 176
HJ 236
HJ 287c
HJ 328
APPENDIX I Map
© 1997
|