HOME Community Fossiel.net
Facebook Fossiel.net In English Please In het Nederlands

Mededeling


Bouw mee aan Fossiel.net!
Hoe kan ik helpen?

Sticky Forum

Informatieve Posts

>> Alle informatieve posts

Nieuwste fossiel uit het Determinatiesysteem

Geo Agenda

>> Meer Agenda items

Georockhop
Mammoet schouderblad F4010
27.50 EUR



Fossil Identification


identification of the genus Glycymeris obovata


Tahiri   22-04-2019 om 14:54

Tahiri
Junior Lid
Lid sinds: 22-04-2019
Berichten: 1





I am in second year of biology in Montpellier in France!
For this period we must make a taxonomic record on a fossil.
So I chose the species pectunculus obovatus
However, there are mainly two subspecies
-Glycymeris (Chevronia) obovata regeileii
-Glycymeris (Chevronia) obovata Baldii
All this asking me if it's not just Glycymeris obovata, Lamarck, 1819?
I do not end up with all the information I have them and wonder how to distinguish between these three?
cordially
Elisa

 
Stijn   22-04-2019 om 18:36

Stijn
Senior Lid
Fotobeheerder
Lid sinds: 15-09-2006
Berichten: 1832

Hi Elisa,

Great that you have a paleotopic in your biology education. But please, as a science student, pay attention to basic taxonomy rules. First of all, Glycymeris obovata is not a genus, but a name of a species (so check the title of your inquiry).
I have never heard of Glycymeris (Chevronia) obovata regeileii, but possibly you are referring to the subspecies ringelei. Is it this one you looking for?

Also, subspecies names are not written with majuscule, so it should be baldii and not Baldii (although, if you go through old papers, it will be regularly written with majuscule, but this refers to a time there was not yet a well established ICZN).

Each subspecies is somewhat different. To sum up the differences, you should check the literature. Part of the answer is, how can it be, evolution . But in general, species and subspecies within the genus Glycymeris are sometimes difficult to distinghuish on a single specimen alone, and a long history of misunderstanding is present in the scientific literature. A PhD student from Leuven (Belgium) made a brakethrough in the early 70ies, and revealed that indeed several different taxa existed through time, but that one, in order to prove it, needed to execute biometric analysis on populations collected from a single stratigraphic horizon prior to naming species and subspecies. Unfortunately, Dolf Ringele's PhD thesis never got published (painfull story), and only few people follow his idea. A good example is the paper in which a new subspecies of Glycymeris obovata was introduced, a species in his honour (Glycymeris (Chevronia) obovata ringelei), in which not a single biometric analysis was presented.

Happy hunting

Stijn



____________________________
"Ammonites are the quintessential
fossils, seemingly covering all the
major themes of paleontology"
Eldredge 1996

 
Smaug   16-05-2019 om 14:18

Smaug
Beheerder
Fotobeheerder
Lid sinds: 11-11-2003
Berichten: 1138

Nice finds!

(Posted to remove the spam from the mainpage)

____________________________
--

Smaug the Mighty,
Smaug the Magnificence,
Smaug the Tremendous,
Smaug the Impenetrable,
Smaug the Chiefest and Greatest of
Calamities!

My armour is like tenfold shields, my teeth are
swords, my claws spears, the shock of my tail
is a thunderbolt, my wings a hurricane, and my
breath death!

 




0